[BadVista Advocate] Novell and Microsoft

Yasith Lahiru Vidanaarachchi yasith.vidanaarachchi at gmail.com
Mon Jun 4 11:22:02 EDT 2007


As Alex said in his mail, maybe some one can make this virtual desktop thing
work on Debian or some othe FREE Operating System. That would definitely be
a huge advantage for Linux.
-- 
\ \ / /__ _  __ (_) | |_ |  |_
.\ V// _` |(_-<  |  ||  _| |  '  \
  |_| \__,_|/__/ |_| \__||_||_|
  http://tuxv.blogspot.com

Don't send me word attachments.
http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html

On 6/4/07, Jacob Maynard <indymaynard at maynard.homelinux.com> wrote:
>
> I agree with this option. If you have a fully functional virtual desktop
> when Microsoft can't even get it right, that gives free software a huge
> leg up on the situation. It's easier for corporations to want to switch
> with useful applications like this. And if corporations switch, home users
> will want to switch. It's all about familiarity.
>
> Jacob
>
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > why not give that code elsewhere? give another distro the leg up on
> > suse. Wait for GPLv3 of course.
> >
> > member greenarrow1 wrote:
> >> Everyone might find this interesting as I sent this to Factory and
> >> Development Lists
> >> for OpenSUSE.
> >>
> >> After reading today about Novell just giving Microsoft advanced data
> >> on virtualization that us developers create without the possibility of
> >> other SUSE developers seeing it beforehand has turned me entirely
> >> against Novell, and SUSE.  What Open Source stands for and my belief
> >> in freedom for software is why I was further developing the virtual
> >> desktop  With the new kernel version which support virtual desktops
> >> and my working with it I have just completely deleted all I have done
> >> which was pointed towards SUSE because I do not want work I do to fall
> >> into the hands of Microsoft and being patented under their operating
> >> system.
> >>
> >> The reason why Microsoft pulled their virtual desktop is because they
> >> cannot get it to work and now I really believe that is one of their
> >> main reasons to team up with Novell to steal our ideas and place it
> >> within proprietary code.  I will not do work that is going to benefit
> >> any company that restricts what one can do on their computer.
> >>
> >> I am sorry to say this as I have been with SUSE from 8.1 and watched
> >> it develop to what it is today but will not stand by and watch a
> >> monopolistic company like Microsoft ruin us or take over SUSE with
> >> Novell's help.  And, please do not flame me as I was once a developer
> >> for Microsoft so I do know their inner workings.
> >>
> >> George
> >> greenarrow1
> >> InNetInvestigations-Forensic
> >> SuSe 10.2/TriStar/Apache
> >> GoBoLinux
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Advocate mailing list
> >> Advocate at badvista.org
> >> http://badvista.fsf.org/mailman/listinfo/advocate
> >>
> >
> > - --
> > ##########################################
> > /"\
> > \ /               ASCII Ribbon Campaign
> >  X   Keep e-mail free of HTML and vCards
> > / \
> > ##########################################
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
> >
> > iD8DBQFGY3vOv2fpCm3KbxcRAua2AJ4jNZhLv6in+vEblor/k77TB1kJCgCgvc7R
> > CjY0ruSobL5Ytt8gW6LBpSw=
> > =w60T
> > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Advocate mailing list
> > Advocate at badvista.org
> > http://badvista.fsf.org/mailman/listinfo/advocate
> >
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Advocate mailing list
> Advocate at badvista.org
> http://badvista.fsf.org/mailman/listinfo/advocate
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://badvista.fsf.org/pipermail/advocate/attachments/20070604/a970414d/attachment.htm


More information about the Advocate mailing list